The development of children’s version of Google search engine, or been forced into an ideal drive

used to big data, Internet thinking, disruptive innovation Chinese science and technology circle, for the development of children’s version of the ocean Google products, mostly behind Google development so completely indifferent, the children’s version of what hides? Is it really like Pavni Diwanji just to let the children enjoy the fun and safe products

 

news, "USA Today" (USA Today) reported that the Google Corporation intends to launch its most popular product versions of children. "USA Today" quoted as saying the Google Corporation vice president of Engineering Pavni Diwanji, Google’s move is "to enable children to enjoy the Google products" is fun and safe

in the United States the development of children’s version of the search engine in the end how hard

Google not only to develop the low collar version of the search engine, including YouTube and Chrome browser video services will be developed only for the use of children under 12 years of age and version. For such an innovation is the driving force of the development of the world’s giants, low collar version of the move to let most people puzzled. But for the United States to understand people will know, all going to get the children as clients of the company will face legal risk is complex, the Google why take the risk to bear children.

?

was the first to collect personal information.

used to big data, Internet thinking, disruptive innovation Chinese science and technology circle, for the development of children’s version of the ocean Google products, mostly behind Google development so completely indifferent, the children’s version of what hides? Is it really like Pavni Diwanji just to let the children enjoy the fun and safe products

Google

in fact, the development of children’s version is not easy in the United States want to, in the past 15 years, "the Federal Trade Commission children’s online privacy protection act" (COPPA) has a series of penalties of more than 20 companies, because these companies without parental consent for children information mining. The most recent example, September, review site Yelp was fined $450 thousand, because it did not add the age limit.

? ? In December 4th, according to

up to the above example, the concept of cognitive or not completely to this. In the United States the development of children’s version of the product is facing many constraints, the restrictions in the film are not graded Chinese is hard to understand. "The Federal Trade Commission children’s online privacy protection act" (COPPA) is characterized in that the requirements of those websites and online services for 12 year old children, or children to collect the following information, a notice of the collection of information to parents and children to get parental consent before collecting personal information; ensure the site requirements parents may modify and correct the information. In addition to protecting the privacy of children, the law also ensure that children search and published in speech, information rights are not adversely affected.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *